Excluded from today's screen — already covered in the last 7 days.
| Company | Researched on |
|---|---|
| KEISEI ELECTRIC RAILWAY CO (9009) | 2026-04-23 |
| M3 INC (2413) | 2026-04-24 |
| ORIENTAL LAND CO (4661) | 2026-04-25 |
| KYORITSU MAINTENANCE (9616) | 2026-04-26 |
| SONY FINANCIAL GROUP INC (8729) | 2026-04-27 |
| ASAHI GROUP HLDGS (2502) | 2026-04-28 |
| Company | Opportunity | Core moat damage | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| DENSO CORP (6902) | 6 | 3 | OEM integration, scale, and systems depth still look intact, so the current pressure is more cyclical and execution-driven than structural. Opportunity is decent but capped by recurring quality provisions, OEM bargaining power, and unresolved semiconductor positioning. |
| V-CUBE INC (3681) | 1 | 9 | Negative equity, going-concern risk, governance failures, and delisting pressure overwhelm any residual customer stickiness. For existing equity, dilution or restructuring risk dominates and the core trust moat is badly damaged. |
| GMO INTERNET INC (4784) | 5 | 4 | The offering overhang is likely temporary and the infrastructure base provides some floor, but GPU cloud economics can turn sharply against the company if utilization or differentiation disappoints. Structural weakening is mostly in advertising, while the new capital-intensive growth leg is still unproven. |
| ANA HOLDINGS INC (9202) | 6 | 2 | Slots, loyalty, and domestic network advantages remain intact, and current earnings pressure is mainly from lagged pass-through of external cost shocks. The opportunity is moderate rather than exceptional because near-term downside still compounds if fuel, FX, and rerouting stay adverse. |
| KOEI TECMO HOLDINGS CO LTD (3635) | 5 | 3 | Core IP and partner relationships remain intact, and a better royalty mix or a strong title can lift earnings quickly. Still, current mix deterioration, outsourcing inflation, and mobile weakness make the skew less attractive than the best names here. |
| TOHO CO LTD (9602) Selected | 9 | 1 | IP ownership, vertical integration, and theater scale appear undamaged, while the current earnings reset is mostly timing, comp, and one-off expense related. Guidance already embeds a lower base and excludes a mega-hit, leaving unusually favorable upside if slate or licensing surprises. |
| JAPAN AIRLINES CO LTD (9201) | 4 | 2 | Core domestic slot and loyalty moats remain sound, but the upside case depends heavily on macro relief rather than company-specific improvement. Structural FX, fuel, and Europe routing pressures make the payoff less asymmetric than it first appears. |
| JAPAN COMMUNICATIONS INC. (9424) | 3 | 4 | The regulatory and technical assets are real, but the moat is still more prospective than proven in economics. Delays, weak cash conversion, and commodity market pricing keep the current setup skewed toward execution risk rather than convex upside. |
| REVOLUTION CO LTD (8894) | 1 | 8 | The core trust-and-compliance moat of the crowdfunding platform has been structurally damaged by fund segregation failures and suspension. Reverse network effects, higher compliance costs, and legal/regulatory tail risk make the equity unattractive. |
| ENISH INC (3667) | 1 | 9 | This is a weak-moat business now facing deeper scale loss, partner trust damage, and compounding cash-burn risk. Upside depends on low-probability hits while downside remains open through dilution and further title erosion. |
| KUBOTEK CORP (7709) | 1 | 8 | Delisting, audit uncertainty, and sustained losses directly weaken continuity assurance, customer confidence, and the ability to fund R&D. The negative loops are structural and make recovery too dependent on multiple sequential fixes. |
| GENDA INC (9166) | 4 | 3 | Domestic scale and landlord relationships remain intact, and North America issues still look more like under-execution than a broken franchise. But leverage and integration drag make downside harder to bound, so the asymmetry is only middling. |
| ANYCOLOR INC (5032) | 4 | 6 | Japan remains strong, but EN brand and network effects have taken real structural damage, which matters because creator ecosystems are path-dependent. Recovery is possible, yet it requires trust repair and execution proof rather than simple mean reversion. |
| KAIHAN CO LTD (3133) | 1 | 8 | There is little durable moat to protect, and the few energy-related advantages tied to project rights and financing have been impaired by write-downs and capital structure weakness. Dilution mechanics and strategic sprawl make the equity highly unattractive. |
| RISE INC (8836) | 2 | 7 | Any local scale advantage is being eroded by asset sales and financing pressure, while profit quality remains weak. Upside requires both macro help and successful repositioning, but the business is currently de-scaling rather than compounding. |
Why this company was selected: TOHO has the cleanest combination of minimal moat damage, already-reset expectations, and genuine upside asymmetry. Unlike most peers, its current issues are mostly time-based, while its integrated IP-distribution-exhibition model preserves a strong floor and retains fat-tailed upside from unmodeled hits and licensing wins.
TOHO Co., Ltd. (9602) is Japan’s leading integrated film-and-entertainment company. This is the film company, not the unrelated pharmaceutical wholesaler with a similar English name. TOHO produces and distributes films, runs the TOHO Cinemas multiplex chain, monetizes anime and character IP such as Godzilla, produces stage works, and owns a meaningful portfolio of urban real estate that helps stabilize cash flow.
Data freshness matters here. The latest clean official annual base is FY2025. More recent data is the full-year FY2026 earnings release dated 14 April 2026, but those figures are unaudited until the annual securities report is filed, which the company says is scheduled for 25 May 2026. A 5-for-1 stock split took effect on 1 March 2026, and some market-data vendors show slightly different 52-week ranges because their split adjustments are not perfectly consistent.
Economics.
| Core item | Value | Classification |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | ~¥1,460-1,470 | Late-April 2026 market-data estimate |
| Market capitalization | ~¥1.22tn | Market-data estimate |
| Net cash | ~¥150bn | FY2026 year-end balance sheet, unaudited; cash plus current securities less borrowings |
| Net income, TTM / last reported full year | ¥51.8bn | FY2026 full-year company disclosure, unaudited |
| Current P/E | ~24x | Market data using FY2026 EPS of ¥61.2 |
| Normalized P/E | ~25-26x | Own estimate using normalized net income of roughly ¥47-48bn |
There is also another layer of asset support: FY2026 year-end investment securities were ¥164.2bn. I do not count all of that as cash. Some of it is strategic, some has tax leakage, and some already contributes dividend income. I only give it partial credit in valuation.
Growth.
| Metric | Value | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR | ~14% | FY2023 to FY2026 official reported numbers; the 5-year view is flattered by post-COVID recovery |
| Net income / EPS CAGR | ~16% | FY2023 to FY2026 official reported numbers; again, recovery effects matter |
| What is actually driving growth? | 1) A very strong film slate and Toho’s dominant domestic distribution/exhibition position. 2) Better monetization of anime/IP and overseas channels through TOHO animation, Godzilla, GKIDS, and related licensing. | |
Those growth rates are real, but they are not all pure compounding. Measured against pre-COVID FY2020, revenue and net income have grown only at mid-single-digit rates. That is the cleaner long-range baseline.
Owner earnings sanity check.
| Bridge | Value | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Net income | ¥51.8bn | FY2026 full-year company disclosure, unaudited |
| Less: sustaining capex | (~¥14bn) | Own estimate; anchored to management’s depreciation / routine renovation baseline |
| Less: working-capital drag | (~¥4bn) | Own estimate from receivables, payables, and inventory trend |
| Owner earnings | ~¥34bn | Own estimate |
| Owner earnings yield | ~2.8% | Own estimate versus current market cap |
Is that meaningfully different from P/E? Yes. Headline earnings say roughly 24x. The rough owner-earnings lens is materially less flattering. The reason is simple: Toho still needs real maintenance investment in cinemas, digital systems, and content working capital. On that basis, the stock is not obviously cheap just because the price has fallen.
Capital efficiency. Recent ROE has been about 9-10%: 9.3% on FY2025 and 10.4% on FY2026. Reported operating returns on invested capital are roughly low- to mid-teens. That is good, but it is not a pure elite compounder. Incremental capital in self-produced hit content and IP can earn very high returns; the blended group return is lower because property and cinema assets absorb capital at steadier, lower rates.
Toho is best understood as an ecosystem with several toll booths around the same content. A successful title can earn money at production, theatrical distribution, cinema exhibition, post-theatrical licensing, merchandise, and sometimes games. Real estate then reduces the fragility of the whole system.
The segment disclosure changed in FY2026, with IP & Anime split out as a separate segment. Management has restated the prior-year segment numbers, so the year-on-year comparisons below are comparable.
| FY2026 segment | Revenue | Operating profit | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Film | ¥182.6bn | ¥37.3bn | Production/distribution, TOHO Cinemas, studio and related film services |
| IP & Anime | ¥75.3bn | ¥17.3bn | TOHO animation, Godzilla licensing, merchandise, games, overseas IP monetization |
| Theatrical | ¥22.3bn | ¥3.5bn | Stage productions and related entertainment |
| Real estate | ¥79.2bn | ¥19.0bn | Property leasing plus road and building-maintenance operations |
Where do profits actually come from? In FY2026, film and IP/anime together produced the growth and upside. Real estate supplied the ballast. Stage was smaller and is now facing the temporary drag from the Imperial Theatre closure and redevelopment cycle.
Why has this been a good business? First, scale and access. In calendar 2025, the Toho group captured roughly 57.9% of Japan’s box office. TOHO Cinemas held about 27% of box-office revenue on only about 19% of screens, which suggests better locations and better content. Second, scarce rights and relationships. Godzilla is owned IP. TOHO animation’s library reached 127 cumulative cours by FY2026. Third, urban real estate provides stability: leasing vacancy was only 0.4% at FY2026 year-end. This is not a software moat built on switching costs; it is a moat built on distribution relationships, screen access, brand, prime sites, and owned or controlled IP.
In plain terms, the stock went from being priced as a record-earnings entertainment winner to being priced as a business whose best year may already be behind it. Late-April 2026 market data put the shares around ¥1,460-1,470, versus a split-adjusted high around ¥2,059. That is a drawdown of roughly 29%. Some market feeds show a lower 52-week low because they did not fully back-adjust the March 2026 stock split, but on split-adjusted feeds the stock is essentially at the bottom of the last year’s range.
The sharpest move came after the 14 April 2026 FY2026 results. The company reported record revenue, record operating profit, and record net profit, raised the dividend, and announced a buyback and cancellation. Yet the shares still sold off. Why? Because the market ignored the year just reported and focused on the year ahead.
FY2027 guidance called for revenue down 4.3%, operating profit down 8.7%, and net income down 20.8%. Fourth-quarter results also looked soft: group operating profit fell to about ¥7.8bn from ¥11.9bn a year earlier, and IP/anime margin dropped to 10.8% from 21.4%. Management said about ¥2.2bn of Q4 costs were one-time, including a content underperformance charge and a non-cash contingent-consideration remeasurement. Even so, investors saw a business whose earnings had suddenly stopped accelerating.
One more nuance matters. The 20.8% decline in guided net income looks worse than the underlying operating picture because FY2026 included ¥8.9bn of investment-security sale gains. The operating profit guide is the cleaner signal, and that decline is smaller. But the market’s reaction tells you what it was worried about: peak slate, margin pressure, and higher overhead just as film comps get harder.
(a) One-time / cyclical / sentiment-driven factors
(b) Medium-term business headwinds
(c) Potential long-term structural threats
Diagnosis first: this still looks much more like TIME than ESSENCE. The near-term earnings dent is mainly slate normalization, one-time Q4 charges, strategic SG&A investment, and the Imperial Theatre redevelopment cycle. I do not see evidence yet that Toho’s core earning mechanisms have been structurally impaired.
Reality Check vs Market Narrative.
| Concern | Quantitative reality check | What it says |
|---|---|---|
| “FY2026 was a one-off peak and the base business is rolling over.” | Revenue rose from ¥244.3bn in FY2023 to ¥283.3bn in FY2024, ¥313.2bn in FY2025, and ¥360.7bn in FY2026. Operating profit rose from ¥44.9bn to ¥59.3bn, ¥64.7bn, and ¥67.9bn. | The base business has been strengthening for several years, not just for one quarter. |
| “IP/anime is structurally broken.” | FY2026 IP/anime revenue still grew 8.5% to ¥75.3bn. Reported segment profit fell from ¥22.2bn to ¥17.3bn, but management says Q4 included ¥2.2bn of one-time charges and points to an adjusted FY2026 margin of about 29% versus the reported 23%. FY2027 guidance already assumes segment profit recovers to ¥22.0bn. | This looks like a margin dip and investment period, not a demand collapse. |
| “Cinema is structurally weakening right now.” | TOHO Cinemas customers rose from 38.4m in FY2025 to 49.0m in FY2026. Group domestic box-office share rose from about 48.3% in calendar 2024 to 57.9% in 2025. | Theater economics may face a secular debate, but current evidence shows strength, not present-tense erosion. |
| “The balance sheet will constrain investment or buybacks.” | Equity ratio was 73.3% in both FY2025 and FY2026. FY2026 cash plus current securities were about ¥148bn against only ¥1.6bn of borrowings. Operating cash flow rose from ¥51.6bn to ¥65.3bn. | This is not a leverage story. The company can fund growth and still return cash. |
| “Real estate is dead weight.” | Real-estate operating profit rose from ¥16.8bn in FY2025 to ¥19.0bn in FY2026. Leasing vacancy improved from 0.9% to 0.4%. | Real estate is doing its job as ballast. The issue is capital efficiency, not operating failure. |
| “Stage is permanently impaired.” | Theatrical revenue slipped only from ¥22.9bn to ¥22.3bn in FY2026, though FY2027 guidance drops to ¥15.3bn as the Imperial Theatre closure weighs more heavily. | This is a real earnings hole, but it is tied to redevelopment, not franchise destruction. |
Structural vs Non-Structural Diagnosis.
| Structural concern | Damaged mechanism | Could time heal within 3 years? | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Streaming and changing viewing habits | Cinema footfall and the long-term pricing umbrella around exhibition | No, not by time alone. This is secular. But Toho can still offset it through share gains, premium formats, eventization, and stronger domestic titles. | (b) Real structural but survivable. It affects one toll booth, not the entire ecosystem. |
| Competition for anime rights and production talent | The IP acquisition funnel and the ability to scale quality production | Partly. It is not automatically reversible, but investment in studios, people, and overseas monetization can defend the position. | (b) Real structural but survivable. If Toho stopped winning top properties, the moat would weaken. Current pipeline evidence does not show that yet. |
| Overseas expansion becoming permanent cost bloat | Operating leverage and return on incremental capital | Yes. This is managerial and allocational, not an irreversible market shift. | (c) Not truly structural. It is a risk to returns, not evidence that the moat is broken. |
No currently visible issue deserves the label (a) Real Structural damage. The Imperial Theatre closure also does not belong in the structural bucket. It hurts profits, but it does not damage the core value-creation mechanism of the franchise.
Partly. The market is right to haircut FY2026 peak earnings. It is wrong if it treats FY2027 guidance as proof that Toho’s earning power has permanently peaked. Management explicitly frames FY2027 as a baseline year that does not assume a mega-hit. That is a conservative starting point, not a franchise obituary.
At the same time, the stock is not screamingly cheap. The shares still trade near 24x last reported earnings and only around a 2.8% rough owner-earnings yield on my conservative estimate. So the setup is: strong business, mostly temporary earnings air pocket, but only moderate mispricing.
Time-as-a-Moat Test.
| Horizon | Could you rebuild a real competitor with ~¥1.22tn cash? | What would still block you? |
|---|---|---|
| 2 years | No. | Prime cinema sites, 700+ screens, creator/publisher relationships, owned IP such as Godzilla, anime committee access, and the integrated marketing/distribution machine cannot be assembled that fast. |
| 5 years | Still unlikely. | You could buy assets and hire people, but not easily replicate Toho’s trust network, domestic release muscle, or the combination of exhibition, licensing, and real-estate ballast. |
| 10 years | Partly, but not fully. | A determined rival could build a meaningful competitor through M&A, but Toho’s century-old brand, Hibiya/Shinjuku property base, owned IP, and entrenched industry relationships would still be hard to match. |
Valuation basis. This is a FY2025 audited base adjusted with FY2026 full-year unaudited results. I use normalized earnings, not owner earnings, as the main valuation anchor because Toho’s content investment runs through working capital and inventory, and a single maintenance-capex estimate is too blunt for a hit-driven media business. Owner earnings remains a useful guardrail, not the main driver. Per-share values below use roughly 832m shares ex treasury after the April 2026 buyback.
| Case | Earnings / owner-earnings base | Normalization adjustments | Required equity yield | Implied equity value | Implied value per share | Upside / downside vs ~¥1,468 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear | ¥42bn normalized net income | Assumes FY2027 guidance is close to steady-state; gives only limited credit to excess financial assets | 5.5% | ~¥0.94tn | ~¥1,135 | ~ -23% |
| Base | ¥48bn normalized net income | Starts from FY2026 reported ¥51.8bn, strips out securities-sale gains, adds back one-time Q4 charges, and gives partial credit to net cash and part of investment securities; no speculative real-estate revaluation | 4.5% | ~¥1.29tn | ~¥1,547 | ~ +5% |
| Bull | ¥54bn normalized net income | Assumes film and IP/anime normalize near FY2026 operating run-rate without relying on extraordinary securities gains; more credit to balance-sheet assets | 4.25% | ~¥1.52tn | ~¥1,828 | ~ +25% |
Read that bridge carefully. The base case is only modestly above today’s market cap. The market may be underpricing Toho by roughly ¥60-70bn, not by hundreds of billions. If FY2027’s softer slate and higher overhead are temporary, there is some value. If they prove to be the new normal, the stock is not cheap.
Moat & Mispricing Score: 6/10. The moat is real: scale in domestic distribution and exhibition, owned IP, and real-estate ballast make Toho stronger than the stock’s recent chart implies. The market is probably getting one thing wrong: it is extrapolating a conservative FY2027 guide and a messy Q4 into a more permanent earnings impairment than the evidence supports. But the market is not wildly wrong on valuation. At roughly ¥1.22tn market cap, after partial credit for excess assets the operating business is still being valued at only a modest discount to my base-case worth.
Put differently, the current price implies roughly a 2.8% owner-earnings yield on my rough owner-earnings estimate, or about a 4.8% normalized earnings yield on the operating business after partial excess-asset credit. I think fair is closer to 4.5%. That is mispricing, but not fat-pitch mispricing.
| Item | Figure | Type | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Latest clean annual base | FY2025 | Audited annual data | Best clean baseline for audited financial analysis |
| Latest reported full-year results | Revenue ¥360.7bn; operating profit ¥67.9bn; net income ¥51.8bn | Unaudited full-year company disclosure | Released 14 April 2026; annual securities report not yet filed |
| Next-year outlook | Revenue ¥345bn; operating profit ¥62bn; net income ¥41bn | Company guidance | Baseline year; management says it does not assume a mega-hit |
| Current market value | Share price ~¥1,468; market cap ~¥1.22tn | Market-data estimate | Late-April 2026; affected by split and buyback share-count changes |
| Net cash | ~¥150bn | Unaudited balance-sheet figure | Cash plus current securities less borrowings; excludes longer-term investment securities |
| Normalized net income | ~¥48bn | Own estimate | Adjusts FY2026 for securities-sale gains and one-time charges |
| Owner earnings | ~¥34bn | Own estimate | Useful sanity check; too blunt to drive valuation on its own |
| Intrinsic value range | ~¥0.94tn to ~¥1.52tn, or ~¥1,135 to ~¥1,828 per share | Own estimate | Bear / base / bull framework, not a price target |
| Bottom-line judgment | Mostly TIME, not ESSENCE | Judgment | Strong franchise, temporary earnings air pocket, only moderate undervaluation |
The practical conclusion is simple. Toho still looks like a durable franchise. The current problem is mainly cyclical and investment-related, not structural damage. But the stock is only moderately mispriced, so this is a watchlist-quality business at a fair-to-slightly-discounted price, not an obvious bargain.
CoffeeAnd — 52-week low lens