Excluded from today's screen — already covered in the last 7 days.
| Company | Researched on |
|---|---|
| NISSIN FOODS HOLDINGS CO. LTD. (2897) | 2026-05-14 |
| NINTENDO CO LTD (7974) | 2026-05-15 |
| SEIBU HOLDINGS INC (9024) | 2026-05-16 |
| TOHO CO LTD (9602) | 2026-05-17 |
| ORIENTAL LAND CO (4661) | 2026-05-18 |
| SEKISUI CHEMICAL CO (4204) | 2026-05-19 |
| Company | Opportunity | Core moat damage | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| ONCOTHERAPY SCIENCE INC (4564) Smart Money | 1 | 9 | Narrow IP/data moat is being structurally eroded by patent-clock slippage, impairments, and weak bargaining power. Resettable warrants make the equity payoff concave, so even good science would likely be heavily diluted before reaching shareholders. |
| SOLASIA PHARMA K K (4597) | 2 | 8 | Finite exclusivity and partner-execution credibility have been materially damaged by delays, failed deals, and impairments. Some recovery is possible, but the remaining upside is reduced by consumed exclusivity time, weaker deal terms, and ongoing funding dependence. |
| LIFE INTELLIGENT ENT HLDGS CO L (5856) | 1 | 7 | The business already had thin, local moats, and the safety/governance issue hurts the one area where trust mattered most. Fragmented operations, liquidity stress, and weak scale make the turnaround multi-step and capital-intensive, with little clean asymmetry for equity. |
| V-CUBE INC (3681) | 1 | 10 | This is among the worst combinations in the set: product impairments, portfolio exits, Telecube liquidation, and counterparty-risk screens have crushed the prior niche moat. With going-concern stress and transaction risk, downside to common equity still dominates any residual upside. |
| MONEX GROUP INC (8698) Selected | 8 | 1 | Core moat damage is minimal: Coincheck's liquidity/licensing/trust and the brokerage franchises remain intact. The sell-off looks driven more by one-offs and cyclical crypto activity than by franchise erosion, while a rebound in activity can create real operating leverage from an intact platform. |
| AGORA HOSPITALITY GROUP CO LTD (9704) | 5 | 1 | There is no clear evidence of moat impairment; the issue is earnings normalization rather than franchise decay. That said, sub-scale hotel economics and low switching costs limit the degree of upside asymmetry, so this is only a middling opportunity. |
| EUGLENA CO LTD (2931) | 6 | 2 | The healthcare franchise appears intact and provides a real operating base, so moat damage is low. Opportunity is decent because reported earnings are burdened by temporary noise, but SAF/feedstock uncertainty, capital intensity, and parent-level leakage keep the setup from being truly convex. |
| WIZE INC (3664) | 1 | 9 | The historical game moat is effectively gone, the lifestyle brand is resource-constrained, and the crypto pivot adds volatility without defensibility. Delisting pressure and asset-price dependence make upside fragile and mostly exogenous rather than business-driven. |
| MEDINET CO LTD (2370) | 3 | 4 | Process know-how, GMP capability, and validated-program switching costs still exist, so core moat damage is limited rather than severe. But resettable warrants make the common equity structurally concave, meaning a large share of any operating improvement may be captured by new capital instead of current holders. |
| ABC CO LTD (8783) | 2 | 5 | There is little durable moat to defend, and the most plausible one, trust in financial services, is being weakened by speculative positioning and serial equity-linked financing. Optionality exists, but it is diluted, fragmented, and too dependent on external market conditions. |
| JIG JP CO LTD (5244) | 4 | 3 | The creator-viewer network still exists and has not been permanently broken, so moat damage is modest. However, reliance on incentives, platform-rule exposure, and acquisition/integration risk make the current payoff profile more operating-leverage-heavy than truly asymmetric. |
| AQUALINE LTD (6173) | 1 | 9 | Trust, lead-generation scale, and franchise-network density have been structurally damaged by sanctions, delisting, and partner attrition. The negative flywheel between governance, funding, marketing, and coverage makes downside compounding and leaves little credible equity upside. |
| ENISH INC (3667) | 1 | 9 | Persistent losses, weak title performance, and reset-style financing have structurally impaired the few moats that mattered here: IP access, live-ops scale, and talent retention. Even if a title works, dilution and reinvestment needs would likely absorb much of the benefit. |
| CREAL INC (2998) | 7 | 2 | Trust, compliance, distribution, and origination advantages appear intact and may even strengthen as regulation tightens. Opportunity is strong because the market is punishing macro/rate pressure more than franchise quality, but legacy inventory exits and funding-spread pressure still create near-term concavity. |
Why this company was selected: 8698 is the best risk-adjusted opportunity in this set because it combines the lowest moat damage with a plausible source of upside that is not purely narrative. The current pressure looks mostly cyclical and one-off, while the underlying exchange and brokerage franchises remain intact. Compared with the other names, it has fewer structural failure paths, less dilution leakage, and more credible operating leverage if activity normalizes.
Monex Group is a Japanese online financial holding company with three economically important assets: the U.S. active-trader broker TradeStation, the Japanese crypto platform Coincheck and related digital-asset businesses, and a growing asset-management platform. It also retains a 51% economic interest in Monex Securities in Japan through Docomo Monex Holdings, which means part of the Japan brokerage business now sits below the equity-method line rather than inside consolidated revenue.
Data freshness matters here. The latest clean official annual base is FY2025. More recent data is partial, delayed, unaudited, or estimated. In practice, that means FY2025 EDINET numbers are the latest audited annual filing, while FY2026 full-year results from the company’s May 12, 2026 earnings release are official company disclosures but not yet audited. I use those FY2026 numbers for TTM earnings and the March 31, 2026 balance-sheet update, and I use a recent market price in the high-¥600s as a market-data estimate. Monex does not provide formal earnings guidance because management views market conditions as too volatile to forecast credibly.
| Core metric | Value | Data type |
|---|---|---|
| Share price used | ~¥685 | Market-data estimate |
| Market capitalization | ~¥172 billion | Market-data estimate using 251.65 million shares |
| Net cash / (net debt) | ~(¥9.8 billion) at the holding company | Management update in FY2026 earnings materials |
| Net income, TTM | ¥10.9 billion | Official FY2026 full-year earnings release, unaudited |
| Current P/E | ~15.8x | Market price / FY2026 unaudited EPS of ¥43.41 |
| Normalized P/E | ~14-16x | Own estimate |
Growth looks strong on a 3-year lens and ordinary on a 5-year lens, which tells you the business mix is cyclical and accounting-noisy. Revenue rose from ¥55.8 billion in FY2023 audited to ¥83.6 billion in FY2026 unaudited, about a 14% 3-year CAGR. Over FY2021 to FY2026, revenue CAGR is only about 1-2%. EPS shows the same pattern: from ¥12.85 in FY2023 audited to ¥43.41 in FY2026 unaudited is roughly 50% CAGR, but the 5-year picture is distorted by the crypto cycle, the Docomo Monex restructuring, and the Coincheck Nasdaq listing charges.
The concrete growth drivers are twofold. First, asset management and wealth management has gone from small to meaningful: segment operating revenue after cost of sales rose from ¥3.5 billion in FY2025 to ¥7.7 billion in FY2026, and Monex Asset Management’s AUM reached roughly ¥1.2 trillion by March-April 2026. Second, the brokerage base keeps expanding through distribution and product depth: Monex Securities’ net operating revenue rose 12.7% year on year in FY2026, while TradeStation’s DARTs rose 5% to 238,365.
| Owner earnings sanity check | Value |
|---|---|
| Net income | ¥10.9 billion |
| Less: sustaining capex | ~¥4.0 billion |
| Plus/minus working capital | Not used; customer balances and regulatory cash swings dominate |
| Rough owner earnings | ~¥7.0 billion |
| Owner earnings yield | ~4.0% |
This is meaningfully lower than the earnings yield implied by the P/E. The reason is straightforward: software, compliance, and platform investment are real cash costs here, and reported free cash flow is distorted by customer-balance movements and acquisition activity. I therefore use owner earnings only as a rough sanity check, not as a precision instrument.
Capital efficiency is mixed. ROIC is not especially useful for a broker and crypto platform because regulatory capital, customer cash, and equity-method accounting muddy the denominator. ROE is the cleaner guide. Official ROE was -4.0% in audited FY2025 because Coincheck’s de-SPAC charges crushed reported earnings. On FY2026 unaudited results, ROE is back to roughly 8-9% on year-end equity, and low-teens is a fairer normalized range if you strip out fair-value noise and one-offs. Incremental capital looks very good in asset management, acceptable in online brokerage, and still unproven in crypto M&A. This is a good platform collection, not a clean high-return compounder.
Monex is best understood as three different businesses under one roof.
| Business | Economic model | FY2026 profit attributable to owners | What matters most |
|---|---|---|---|
| Online brokerage | Trading commissions, payment-for-order-flow and other commissions, margin and securities-lending income, interest on customer cash, plus equity-method earnings from Monex Securities | ¥9.35 billion | Trading activity, client cash balances, active-trader retention, NTT Docomo distribution |
| Crypto asset | Marketplace and exchange spreads, staking, IEO-related revenue, custody and institutional services | (¥1.39 billion) | Trading volumes, trust, regulation, customer asset growth, ability to diversify revenue away from spot trading |
| Asset management / wealth management | Management fees, performance fees, advisory revenue, wealth-management economics | ¥4.99 billion | AUM growth, fee mix, performance-fee variability, cross-sell from the group |
| Investment / other | Venture and investment gains or losses | ¥0.15 billion | Exit timing and valuation marks |
Profits currently come from online brokerage and, increasingly, asset management. In FY2026 unaudited results, online brokerage contributed ¥9.35 billion of profit attributable to owners. Asset management and wealth management added ¥4.99 billion, though that figure benefited from a Westfield fair-value gain and from performance-fee intensity that will not recur evenly every year. Crypto lost ¥1.39 billion, so it is not today’s profit engine; it is a volatile option on future platform breadth.
The business quality is better than the headline volatility suggests. TradeStation recorded its highest annual revenue in FY2026 and has genuine niche strength with active traders, especially in options and multi-leg workflows. Monex Securities has the trust, tax-wrapper relevance, and distribution leverage of the NTT Docomo relationship. Coincheck remains one of the best-known consumer crypto brands in Japan and still has scale in customer accounts and assets. The moat is real but moderate: licenses, trust, custody, compliance, and embedded assets matter, but switching costs are not absolute and pricing power is limited in brokerage and crypto.
The shares are near their 52-week low because investors are refusing to capitalize FY2026’s headline rebound at face value. Monex traded around ¥905 at its 52-week high in late August 2025, fell to about ¥658 on March 30, 2026, and recently sat around ¥685, only a few percent above the low. That is a drawdown of roughly 24-27% from the peak.
The market appears to be saying three things. First, FY2026’s swing back to profit is partly optical because FY2025 was hit by Coincheck de-SPAC charges. Second, the two most cyclical pieces of the group both softened into Q4: Coincheck’s marketplace activity cooled and TradeStation’s net-interest tailwind moderated while expenses spiked. Third, Monex still looks like a conglomerate with uneven earnings quality: solid brokerage, promising asset management, but crypto volatility and fair-value noise in the reported numbers.
(a) One-time, cyclical, or sentiment-driven factors.
(b) Medium-term business headwinds.
(c) Potential long-term structural threats.
Reality check versus the market narrative.
| Concern | What the data says | Bottom line |
|---|---|---|
| The FY2026 rebound is fake. | FY2025 audited pre-tax profit from continuing operations was a loss of ¥4.6 billion, but that year included ¥13.7 billion of de-SPAC stock compensation and ¥4.5 billion of listing-related fees. Add those back and FY2025 underlying pre-tax earnings were closer to the mid-¥10 billions. FY2026 unaudited pre-tax profit was ¥15.8 billion. | The rebound is partly optical, but not purely optical. |
| Online brokerage is weakening. | Online brokerage segment operating revenue after cost of sales rose from ¥45.1 billion in FY2025 to ¥46.5 billion in FY2026. Segment pre-tax profit rose from ¥10.7 billion to ¥11.7 billion. TradeStation DARTs rose from 227,996 to 238,365. Monex Securities net operating revenue rose from ¥38.3 billion to ¥43.2 billion. | Annual trend is still healthy; Q4 softness was real but not thesis-breaking. |
| Crypto is collapsing. | Crypto segment operating revenue after cost of sales went from ¥16.0 billion in FY2025 to ¥15.8 billion in FY2026, only a small decline, even though marketplace trading value fell from ¥337.5 billion to ¥312.6 billion. Net staking income increased by roughly ¥1.4 billion and partially offset lower trading income. Coincheck ended March 2026 with 2.53 million accounts and about ¥730 billion of customer assets. | Earnings are volatile; the franchise is not obviously shrinking. |
| Asset management is too small to matter. | Asset-management and wealth-management segment operating revenue more than doubled from ¥3.5 billion in FY2025 to ¥7.7 billion in FY2026. Monex Asset Management’s institutional private-fund AUM rose from about ¥119 billion at March 2023 to about ¥999 billion at March 2026. Group asset-management AUM reached roughly ¥1.2 trillion by spring 2026. | This is now material enough to change the earnings mix. |
| Leverage is dangerous. | Management’s cleaner measure is holdco net debt of about ¥9.8 billion at March 2026, versus group equity of about ¥130 billion. Operating cash flow was positive in FY2024, FY2025, and FY2026. KDDI also agreed to invest about ¥10 billion into Coincheck Group. | The consolidated broker balance sheet looks large, but balance-sheet fragility is not the core problem. |
FY2025 and FY2026 crypto and asset-management segment comparisons above use management’s restated basis after 3iQ was moved into the crypto segment.
Most of what pushed the shares down looks like time, not essence. The structural questions are narrower. I do not see clear evidence that Monex’s current earnings base has been permanently impaired. I do see several structural risks worth underwriting explicitly.
| Structural concern | Damaged mechanism | Does it damage core value creation? | Reversible within 3 years? | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brokerage commoditization and lower rate sensitivity | Monetization of client trading flow and client cash balances | Partly. If commissions and net interest both compress, the brokerage engine earns less on the same asset base. | Mostly yes. TradeStation still owns a niche with active traders and product depth. Monex Securities is moving toward asset gathering rather than pure commission dependence. | (b) Real structural but survivable |
| Cyber or regulatory damage at Coincheck | Customer acquisition funnel, custody trust, and willingness to hold assets on-platform | Yes, if it happens. Trust is the core asset in crypto brokerage. | No, not quickly, if there were a major breach or hostile regulation. But there is no current evidence of such damage in the numbers. | (c) Not truly structural today; this is the tail risk that could become (a) fast |
| Conglomerate complexity and capital allocation | Conversion of business value into shareholder value | Not directly. It hurts valuation and can reduce incremental returns if capital is misallocated, but it does not by itself destroy customer economics. | Yes. Better disclosure, portfolio pruning, or disciplined reinvestment can narrow this within 3 years. | (c) Not truly structural |
| Performance-fee heavy asset-management mix | Earnings quality and repeatability, not customer demand | No. The core fee business still improves as AUM rises. | Yes. More recurring AUM can dilute the performance-fee noise over time. | (c) Not truly structural |
Observed issues today do not qualify as clear (a) real structural damage. The market is reacting to volatility, noisy accounting, and mix uncertainty. Those are real, but they are not the same as permanent franchise erosion.
Time-as-a-moat test.
Moat & mispricing score: 6/10. The moat is real but moderate. The market is right that Monex is not a pristine compounder and that FY2026 headline earnings flatter the underlying improvement versus FY2025. The market is wrong, in my view, if it treats Monex as nothing more than a plain cyclical broker. Online brokerage still earned real money, asset management is becoming a genuine fee engine, and the KDDI transaction gives an external mark to the crypto platform that the market only partly credits. That said, the rough owner-earnings yield is only mid-single digits, so this is a measured mispricing, not a fat pitch.
Using rough FY2026 owner earnings of about ¥7 billion, the current share price implies an owner-earnings yield of roughly 4%. For a plain broker with crypto exposure, I would normally want 6% or more. The reason I still see some undervaluation is that near-term owner earnings do not capture two things well: the faster-growing, lower-capital-intensity asset-management platform, and the externally validated value of Coincheck Group after KDDI’s announced investment. I do not add back stock-based compensation in this view; Coincheck RSU expense is treated as a real cost.
Valuation basis. This is a FY2026 earnings-release-based valuation adjusted with management’s March 31, 2026 balance-sheet update, the announced KDDI transaction, and my own normalized earnings estimates. I value the online brokerage and asset-management businesses off normalized equity earnings and required equity yields, then add a separate value for the crypto business anchored partly to KDDI’s planned ¥10 billion investment for 14.9% of Coincheck Group. I assume investment assets and residual corporate overhead roughly offset outside the holdco net debt figure.
| Case | Valuation bridge | Equity value | Value per share | Vs. ¥685 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear | Online brokerage ¥95b + Asset management ¥25b + Crypto ¥25b - Holdco net debt ¥10b | ¥135b | ~¥537 | ~-22% |
| Base | Online brokerage ¥110b + Asset management ¥35b + Crypto ¥50b - Holdco net debt ¥10b | ¥185b | ~¥735 | ~+7% |
| Bull | Online brokerage ¥130b + Asset management ¥50b + Crypto ¥65b - Holdco net debt ¥10b | ¥235b | ~¥934 | ~+36% |
The base case says the market cap is low by roughly ¥13 billion, or about ¥50 per share. That is enough to keep the name interesting, not enough to call it an obvious bargain. If you give no credit to Coincheck’s externally marked value or to the asset-management mix shift, the shares are around fair. If those two pieces compound, there is real upside.
CoffeeAnd — 52-week low lens