Excluded from today's screen — already covered in the last 7 days.
| Company | Researched on |
|---|---|
| SEKISUI CHEMICAL CO (4204) | 2026-05-19 |
| MONEX GROUP INC (8698) | 2026-05-20 |
| MATSUKIYOCOCOKARA & CO (3088) | 2026-05-21 |
| ISTYLE INC (3660) | 2026-05-22 |
| SEIBU HOLDINGS INC (9024) | 2026-05-23 |
| ZOZO INC (3092) | 2026-05-24 |
| Company | Opportunity | Core moat damage | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| TOHO CO LTD (9602) Selected | 9 | 2 | Moat remains strong across IP, distribution and exhibition, with current pressure mostly from slate normalization, cost inflation and investment digestion. Guidance is framed off a no-mega-hit baseline, so downside looks better bounded than upside. |
| SBI SHINSEI BANK LTD (8303) | 7 | 2 | Offering and relisting pressure are finite while the stronger capital base reduces tail risk. The main restraint is mediocre earnings quality and non-bank funding-cost exposure, not material moat breakage. |
| ORIENTAL LAND CO (4661) | 6 | 1 | The core brand/location moat is essentially intact and unmatched, but near-term economics are capped by outages, renovations and a structurally higher cost base. Excellent business, but the payoff is delayed rather than sharply asymmetric today. |
| DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO (1925) | 5 | 3 | Scale, procurement and development capabilities still stand, and mix/timing issues can normalize. However, leverage, rate sensitivity and dependence on development gains keep the current setup more cyclical than convex. |
| RAKUTEN BANK LTD (5838) | 4 | 3 | The ecosystem moat is still real and integration could strengthen it, but dilution, thin capital headroom and parent-related governance overhang create negative near-term convexity. Upside exists, yet current equity mechanics are unfavorable. |
| KYUSHU RAILWAY COMPANY (9142) | 4 | 3 | The rail monopoly is intact and provides relevance and asset backing, but project cancellations, climate losses and higher rates reduce the value of the development option. This is more a resilience story than a high-asymmetry opportunity. |
| SUNDRUG CO LTD (9989) | 4 | 4 | Weather and inbound weakness are temporary, and the core retail engine is not broken. The problem is relative scale pressure after competitor consolidation, which can chip away at procurement and margin advantages if not answered. |
| JIG JP CO LTD (5244) | 3 | 5 | There is still a path to recovery if promotion spend deepens creator and payer retention, but that is unproven. The risk of reverse network effects and rival creator lock-in makes the current setup structurally fragile. |
| ENECHANGE LTD (4169) | 3 | 6 | Exiting EV charging reduces capital drag, but the remaining core moat is narrow and exposed to external power-price dynamics. Governance damage and limited B2B stickiness keep upside from being truly asymmetric. |
| AHRESTY CORPORATION (5852) | 2 | 7 | Japan and Asia are functioning, but North America shows real damage to reliability, process know-how and customer standing. Recovery is possible, yet it is slow and the downside remains open until NA is definitively fixed or exited. |
| MEDINET CO LTD (2370) | 2 | 6 | Technical capability may still exist, but ongoing financial stress is already weakening customer trust and slowing the buildout of sticky programs. Equity upside depends on a long sequence of execution and financing cooperation. |
| FUNPEP COMPANY LTD (4881) | 2 | 8 | Potential asset upside exists, but there is no realized moat today and the financing structure is hostile to existing shareholders. Even good data may be diluted away before value accrues per share. |
| ANGES INC (4563) | 1 | 10 | The only realized moat was effectively lost with the approval withdrawal and recall, while partner loss further weakens commercial leverage. Equity now sits inside a financing reflexivity loop with poor downside bounds. |
| THE WHY HOW DO COMPANY INC (3823) Smart Money | 1 | 9 | Cheap capital access and acquisition execution were the only plausible moats, and both are impaired. Adjustable-price dilution, weak cash conversion and process slippage make the equity structurally concave. |
| ENISH INC (3667) | 1 | 9 | Any soft moat in licensor access, UA efficiency and live-ops has deteriorated as scale, trust and cash have fallen. This remains a capital-constrained hit-driven business with weak downside protection. |
Why this company was selected: 9602 offers the best risk-adjusted asymmetry in the set: moat damage is minimal, current earnings pressure is mostly timing and investment related, and management’s baseline excludes mega-hit upside while continuing shareholder returns. Most alternatives either face real structural moat erosion or capital structures that turn business improvement into dilution rather than per-share compounding.
TOHO is a Japanese entertainment company with four meaningful engines: film distribution and exhibition, anime and character IP monetization, theatrical productions, and urban real estate. The combination matters. The entertainment side provides growth and operating leverage; the real estate side dampens the volatility that would otherwise come with a hit-driven content business.
Data freshness. The latest clean official annual base is FY2026 ended 28 February 2026, using the company’s audited annual financial statements included in its May 2026 shareholder materials. The FY2026 annual securities report was due the next day, so some structured databases were still lagging on FY2025 when reviewed. I therefore use the company’s audited FY2026 materials for annual fundamentals, and market data for current share price and equity value. No newer official quarterly results were available in the materials reviewed. All per-share figures below are split-adjusted for the 5-for-1 stock split effective 1 March 2026.
| Core item | Value | Type / period |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | ¥1,242 | Market data, 22 May 2026 |
| Equity value | ~¥1.04 trillion | Market-data estimate using price × 839.35m shares excluding treasury |
| Net cash | ~¥111 billion | Audited FY2026 balance sheet; cash and deposits + current securities less borrowings |
| Net income (TTM) | ¥51.8 billion | Audited FY2026 annual data |
| Current P/E | 20.3x | Current price ÷ audited FY2026 EPS of ¥61.20 |
| Normalized P/E | ~22x-24x | Own estimate using normalized EPS of roughly ¥52-55 |
| Revenue CAGR | ~14% | Audited FY2023-FY2026 |
| Net income / EPS CAGR | ~16% / ~17% | Audited FY2023-FY2026 |
I use treasury-share-adjusted equity value for analytical consistency because EPS is calculated on the same basis. Public quote screens round current market cap to roughly ¥1.06 trillion.
Growth has been driven by two things, not ten. First, a stronger film slate and higher cinema throughput: audited FY2026 film revenue rose 30.6% and movie theater customers rose 27.6% to 49.0 million. Second, IP monetization: anime and character franchises such as Godzilla, Jujutsu Kaisen, Haikyu!!, My Hero Academia, and The Apothecary Diaries continue to generate streaming, licensing, and merchandise revenue both domestically and abroad.
| Owner earnings sanity check | JPY | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Net income | ¥51.8bn | Audited FY2026 |
| Less: sustaining capex | (~¥14bn) | Own estimate, anchored to depreciation-equivalent maintenance guidance |
| Less: working-capital drag | (~¥2-4bn) | Own estimate |
| Rough owner earnings | ~¥34-36bn | Own estimate |
| Owner earnings yield | ~3.3%-3.5% | Own estimate on current equity value |
Yes, that is meaningfully lower than the earnings yield implied by the 20.3x P/E. The reason is simple: TOHO is not a software company. It has real maintenance needs in cinemas, real estate, and digital infrastructure, and FY2026 net income also benefited from investment-security gains.
Capital efficiency. ROE has been roughly 9%-10% in the last three audited years. Operating ROIC appears to be low-teens to mid-teens, but group-level incremental returns are lower than the best IP businesses because capital is also parked in real estate, cinemas, excess liquidity, and strategic holdings. This is a durable franchise. It is not a pure high-return compounder.
TOHO makes money by controlling more of the value chain than most entertainment businesses: it helps source and produce content, distributes films, exhibits them through a leading cinema network, monetizes IP through streaming and merchandise, produces live stage works, and owns real estate that throws off stable cash flow.
| FY2026 segment | Revenue | Operating profit | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Film | ¥182.6bn | ¥37.3bn | Production, distribution, cinemas, studio and art production |
| IP & Anime | ¥75.3bn | ¥17.3bn | Streaming, licensing, merchandise, Godzilla and TOHO animation |
| Theatrical | ¥22.3bn | ¥3.5bn | Stage productions, ticketing, talent management |
| Real Estate | ¥79.2bn | ¥19.0bn | Property leasing, road maintenance, building management |
Before corporate costs, film and IP/anime together generated about 71% of segment operating profit in FY2026. Real estate provided about 25%. That real estate ballast is not cosmetic. In pandemic-hit FY2021, the real estate segment still produced about ¥17.1 billion of operating profit while theatrical operations were loss-making. That stabilizer lowers fragility.
The business quality is better than it looks from a “movie studio” label. TOHO has a leading domestic distribution position, a nationwide cinema footprint of 717 screens, valuable long-lived franchises, and long-standing relationships with publishers, creators, talent, advertisers, and landlords. Recent official disclosures also show TOHO Cinemas holding roughly 19% screen share and 27% box-office share in Japan, which is a strong sign of customer pull and bargaining power. The moat is not one thing; it is an ecosystem of content access, distribution scale, exhibition footprint, brand trust, and prime-location assets.
The important caveat is that profits are still hit-driven. A great slate can produce eye-catching earnings; a weaker slate can make the business look suddenly expensive. That is why the real estate ballast matters, and it is also why TOHO should be treated as a high-quality franchise with moderate group returns, not as a frictionless compounding machine.
The shares are near a 52-week low because the market stopped paying for a peak-year narrative. The stock is roughly 40% below its 52-week high of ¥2,059 and only about 3% above its 52-week low of ¥1,208. The immediate trigger was the 14 April 2026 full-year release: FY2026 itself was excellent, but FY2027 guidance came in soft and the fourth quarter looked weak relative to expectations.
Investors appear to be reacting to five concrete negatives. First, FY2027 guidance calls for revenue of ¥345.0bn, operating profit of ¥62.0bn, and net income of ¥41.0bn, implying declines of 4.3%, 8.7%, and 20.8% respectively from FY2026. Second, the fourth quarter missed market expectations and included about ¥2.2bn of one-off IP/anime-related charges. Third, FY2026 benefited from unusually strong film monetization, including revenue tied to Godzilla Minus One, which investors do not believe will repeat. Fourth, the Imperial Theatre closure continues to weigh on near-term theatrical economics. Fifth, management openly said SG&A will stay elevated as it invests in overseas capacity, digital infrastructure, and the new TOHO-ONE customer platform. That is not what the market wanted after a record year.
In plain English: the stock fell because investors think FY2026 was close to peak, FY2027 is a digestion year, and the business still is not cheap enough to absorb that disappointment without a derating.
(a) One-time / cyclical / sentiment-driven factors
(b) Medium-term business headwinds
(c) Potential long-term structural threats
Reality check versus market narrative.
| Concern | Quantitative reality | Diagnosis |
|---|---|---|
| “Earnings are falling off a cliff.” | Audited operating profit moved from ¥44.9bn in FY2023 to ¥59.3bn in FY2024, ¥64.7bn in FY2025, and ¥67.9bn in FY2026. FY2027 guidance is ¥62.0bn, not a collapse. | Real normalization after a very strong year, but not evidence of a broken earnings engine. |
| “IP and anime have already rolled over.” | IP & Anime revenue rose from ¥69.4bn in FY2025 to ¥75.3bn in FY2026, while operating profit fell from ¥22.2bn to ¥17.3bn. | Demand and monetization are still growing; the problem is margin compression from upfront investment and one-offs, not revenue erosion. |
| “Imperial Theatre closure is a major business hole.” | Theatrical revenue went from ¥22.9bn in FY2025 to ¥22.3bn in FY2026, and operating profit from ¥4.1bn to ¥3.5bn. | Painful, but manageable. The closure dents profit; it does not impair the franchise. |
| “The cinema business is structurally declining.” | TOHO movie-theater customers rose from 38.4m in FY2025 to 49.0m in FY2026. Japan’s 2025 box office reached ¥274.5bn, an all-time high. | No current evidence of structural decline in attendance. The long-term threat exists, but the present data do not show damage. |
| “Real estate is weakening and cannot stabilize the group.” | Real-estate vacancy improved from 0.9% at FY2025 year-end to 0.4% at FY2026 year-end. Segment operating profit rose from ¥16.8bn to ¥19.0bn. | The ballast is intact. |
| “Balance-sheet risk is rising.” | Net assets rose from ¥423.7bn in FY2023 to ¥484.8bn in FY2024, ¥494.8bn in FY2025, and ¥533.0bn in FY2026. Equity ratio stayed at 73.3% in FY2025 and FY2026. | No leverage stress. This is the opposite of fragility. |
Structural risks that actually matter.
| Structural concern | Damaged mechanism | Reversible within 3 years? | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Streaming and at-home substitution | The cinema footfall and concession-profit mechanism | Not fully. Premium formats, local hits, pricing, and event content can offset some of it, but the industry trend itself is not reversible on demand. | (b) Real structural but survivable |
| Competition for anime rights, studios, and creative talent | The IP sourcing funnel and return on content investment | Not really. Industry competition will remain intense. What helps Toho is scale, relationships, and overseas monetization capacity. | (b) Real structural but survivable |
| Japan’s population decline | The long-run ceiling on domestic audience growth | No. Time alone does not heal demographics. The only answer is mix shift, pricing, and overseas expansion. | (b) Real structural but survivable |
| Overseas M&A and expansion mis-execution | Capital-allocation discipline | Yes, if management stays disciplined. This is a governance and execution risk, not currently evidence of moat erosion. | (c) Not truly structural at present |
The key point is that the current market anxiety is mostly not about essence. The core value-creation loop still works: source or own attractive IP, distribute it at scale, monetize across multiple formats, and support the volatility with a very strong balance sheet and real estate cash flow. The moat does not look broken.
Time-as-a-moat test. If I had TOHO’s current market value in cash, I could buy assets, hire people, and overpay for a few rights packages. I still would not recreate TOHO quickly.
| Rebuild horizon | Could you realistically rebuild a credible rival? | What would still block you? |
|---|---|---|
| 2 years | No | Prime cinema locations, distributor relationships, production committees, publisher ties, audience trust, and bankable IP cannot be assembled that fast. |
| 5 years | Only partially | You could buy some assets and perhaps build a niche anime platform, but not TOHO’s integrated production-distribution-exhibition ecosystem or its brand position in Japan. |
| 10 years | You might build a respectable challenger | Even then, TOHO’s accumulated IP library, creator and talent relationships, real estate footprint, nationwide exhibition presence, and brand trust would still be difficult to replicate. |
Moat & mispricing score: 6/10. The moat is real. TOHO has scale in theatrical distribution, a leading cinema footprint, proven IP monetization, and real estate ballast that reduces fragility. The market is too willing to treat a post-peak digestion year as evidence of franchise deterioration. But the stock is not obviously cheap: at the current price it trades at about 20.3x audited FY2026 EPS, about 25.4x FY2027 guided EPS, roughly 22x-24x my normalized EPS, and only about 3.3%-3.5% on a simple owner-earnings sanity check. So the market is probably wrong on essence, but only modestly wrong on price.
Management’s own FY2028 goal is operating profit of at least ¥70bn, only modestly above FY2026’s ¥67.9bn. That is important. This is not a hypergrowth story that should be underwritten on blue-sky multiple expansion. It is a quality franchise going through a normalization year.
| Case | Earnings base | Normalization | Required equity yield | Net cash / excess financial assets added | Implied equity value | Implied value / share | Vs. current price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear | ¥40bn | Assumes FY2026 was a clear peak, cost pressure persists, and IP margin recovery disappoints | 5.25% | ¥95bn | ~¥857bn | ~¥1,020 | -18% |
| Base | ¥46bn | Between FY2027 guidance and FY2026 adjusted earnings; assumes no lasting franchise damage | 4.75% | ¥100bn | ~¥1.07tn | ~¥1,273 | +2% |
| Bull | ¥52bn | Assumes IP/anime investment monetizes well and film/theater normalize at high levels | 4.25% | ¥110bn | ~¥1.33tn | ~¥1,589 | +28% |
At the current price, the market is implying roughly a 4.4% yield on my normalized cash-earnings view of about ¥46bn. I would want about 4.75% for the operating business given the hit-driven nature of content earnings, even after giving credit for balance-sheet strength. That is why my base case comes out only slightly above the current price. My conclusion: this is a time problem, not an essence problem, but the valuation gap is modest.
This is an intrinsic-value estimate, not a price target.
| Item | Value | Classification | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Latest clean official annual base | FY2026 ended 28 Feb 2026 | Audited annual data | Used from the company’s May 2026 shareholder materials |
| More recent official quarterly data | None reviewed | Fact | No newer official quarterly figures were available in the reviewed materials |
| Current share price | ¥1,242 | Market data | 22 May 2026 |
| Current equity value | ~¥1.04tn | Market-data estimate | Based on treasury-share-adjusted share count |
| FY2026 revenue / operating profit / net income | ¥360.7bn / ¥67.9bn / ¥51.8bn | Audited annual data | Latest official full-year figures used |
| FY2027 revenue / operating profit / net income | ¥345.0bn / ¥62.0bn / ¥41.0bn | Company guidance | Management forecast, not fact |
| Net cash | ~¥111bn | Audited annual data | Cash and deposits + current securities less borrowings; cash-equivalents-only net cash would be lower |
| Normalized EPS | ~¥52-55 | Own estimate | Used for normalized P/E only |
| Sustaining capex | ~¥14bn | Own estimate | Anchored to maintenance guidance and depreciation level |
| Rough owner earnings | ~¥34-36bn | Own estimate | Simple sanity check, not textbook owner earnings |
| Main judgment | Time, not essence | Judgment | FY2027 looks like digestion after a peak year, not structural impairment |
| Valuation judgment | Roughly fair to modestly cheap | Judgment | Strong franchise, but not a wide valuation disconnect |
If I reduce the whole case to one sentence: TOHO looks like a strong Japanese entertainment franchise whose near-term earnings are normalizing, not collapsing; the market is mostly confusing time with essence, but the stock is only somewhat mispriced rather than obviously cheap.
CoffeeAnd — 52-week low lens