← Back to 52-Week Low Lens

MONEX GROUP INC

Companies not considered today (recently researched)

Excluded from today's screen — already covered in the last 7 days.

CompanyResearched on
PLAID INC (4165)2026-06-14
NIHON KOHDEN CORP (6849)2026-06-15
KOBE BUSSAN CO LTD (3038)2026-06-16
BANDAI NAMCO HOLDINGS INC (7832)2026-06-17
INSOURCE CO LTD (6200)2026-06-18
KONAMI GROUP CORPORATION (9766)2026-06-19

Companies considered by the decision LLM

CompanyOpportunityCore moat damageRationale
MONEX GROUP INC (8698) Selected82Recent weakness is mostly one-off listing cost, reporting noise, and cycle sensitivity rather than franchise erosion. Brokerage licenses, Coincheck liquidity, and customer distribution remain intact, giving the cleanest operating-leverage upside in the set.
KOEI TECMO HOLDINGS CO LTD (3635)63Core IP, genre expertise, and partner relationships still look intact, while the main issue is a thin release slate. Back catalog and co-development help bound downside, and a normal slate can swing earnings materially.
COVER CORPORATION (5253)63The Hololive brand, fan community, and commercialization engine remain largely intact. HoloEarth losses are already flushed out, but tariff friction and talent/community stability keep the upside from being cleaner.
NTT INC (9432)44Spectrum, access, and network-density assets are still strong, but monetization is under structural pressure from pricing, regulation, and higher financing costs. Downside is asset-bounded, yet upside needs several fixes at once.
SEGA SAMMY HLDGS INC (6460)45Console IP and pachislot relationships remain real moats, and refocusing developers back to full games can help. But the mobile/iGaming moat expansion was weaker than assumed, so upside is hit-driven rather than truly compounding.
SAWAI GROUP HOLDINGS CO LTD (4887)45Scale, channel relationships, and generic penetration tailwinds still matter, but higher compliance costs and underutilization have weakened the cost moat. The case improves if throughput normalizes, though structural price pressure caps asymmetry.
AEON CO LTD (8267)35Scale, mall traffic, and ecosystem advantages still exist, but core retail economics are being competed away in low-switching-cost categories. Multi-year capex and integration needs make the payoff profile more grind than asymmetry.
IKK HOLDINGS INC (2198)35Brand and pricing power are holding up, but shrinking marriage volumes and higher customer-acquisition costs structurally weaken venue economics. Upside exists, yet it is capped unless share gains outrun market decline.
SANBIO COMPANY LIMITED (4592)36There is meaningful first-in-class upside if CMC, reimbursement, and post-marketing obligations all clear. But the moat is still forming, and manufacturing plus financing fragility make downside hard to bound today.
TMS CO LTD (4891)36The scientific IP is still alive, but ex-Japan royalty economics, partner dependence, and warrant-driven dilution narrow value capture. The upside catalyst is real but deferred and partially capped.
ANYCOLOR INC (5032)37Japan remains solid, but EN trust and network effects appear structurally damaged, and merchandise execution is still noisy. Recovery requires rebuilding the creator-fan flywheel, not just lapping write-downs.
COLOPL INC (3668)27Aging titles, a long pipeline gap, and reduced UA scale are eroding a narrow live-ops and licensor-access edge. Upside is long-dated and binary while capability decay can continue in the meantime.
ATOM CORPORATION (7412)28Repeated impairments, store closures, and wage pressure point to structural weakening of already-thin scale and brand advantages. The business is caught in negative operating leverage with limited pricing power.
S CRYPTO ENERGY INC (5721)19There is no durable moat today, and volatile crypto exposure plus a high cost of capital make it harder to build one in storage. Upside is mostly exogenous to bitcoin rather than driven by improving competitive position.
HODL1 INC (2345)110Divestments and governance damage appear to have stripped out most prior relationship and know-how advantages, with no new moat yet visible. The setup is dilution-prone, moat-light, and dependent on external crypto conditions.

Why this company was selected: 8698 has the best combination of low structural moat damage and time-based current pressure in this group. The recent loss was largely non-recurring, while licenses, distribution, and Coincheck liquidity remain intact. That leaves meaningful upside from normalization in crypto activity and operating leverage, with downside becoming severe only if trust or exchange liquidity actually deteriorate.

1. Company Overview

Monex Group is a Japanese digital financial holding company with three economically important businesses: online brokerage, crypto, and asset management. It owns the U.S. active-trader broker TradeStation, controls the crypto platform Coincheck, and has a growing asset-management and wealth-management arm. It also still has major economic exposure to Monex Securities in Japan, although that business moved to equity-method accounting after the NTT Docomo transaction. That accounting point matters: Monex’s headline consolidated revenue now understates the economic size of its Japanese brokerage franchise, so segment profit and customer-asset data matter more than the top-line number alone.

The latest clean official annual base is FY2025, the audited year ended March 31, 2025. More recent data comes from the FY2026 full-year earnings release disclosed on May 12, 2026. That release is official but unaudited. Current share price and market capitalization below are market-data estimates using the June 18, 2026 share price. A post-balance-sheet event also matters: on June 9, 2026, KDDI completed a US$65 million investment for a 14.9% stake in Coincheck Group. Strategically that helps distribution and capital flexibility, but it is not yet a proven earnings driver.

Metric Value Type Comment
Share price About ¥634 Market-data estimate Near the bottom of a roughly ¥625-905 52-week range.
Market cap About ¥159.5bn Market-data estimate Based on about 251.65m shares outstanding.
Net cash / (net debt) About (¥9.8bn) Official company update, unaudited FY2026 earnings materials This is holding-company net debt. Consolidated debt is not a useful shorthand because customer deposits, trust assets, and trading-related liabilities dominate the balance sheet.
Net income, TTM ¥10.9bn Official company earnings release, unaudited FY2026 full year Profit attributable to owners for the year ended March 31, 2026.
Current P/E About 14.6x Market data using official TTM EPS Uses FY2026 earnings-release EPS of ¥43.41. FY2025 audited P/E is not useful because FY2025 was loss-making.
Normalized P/E About 14-16x My estimate Based on normalized EPS of roughly ¥40-45.
Revenue CAGR About 6.8% over FY2020-FY2025 Audited annual data Useful only with caution because Monex Securities moved to equity-method accounting in 2024 and business scope changed.
Net income / EPS CAGR Not meaningful on a reported 5-year basis Judgment from audited and unaudited official data The series is distorted by Coincheck listing costs, business mix changes, and market cyclicality.

The real growth picture is simpler than the headline numbers suggest. Two drivers matter. First, the group is gathering more client assets through the Monex Securities and NTT Docomo channel: Monex Securities’ assets under custody reached about ¥10.8tn by March 2026, and new account openings were up sharply in FY2026. Second, the AM/WM segment is scaling quickly through fee-bearing assets and performance fees. Crypto can add growth spurts, but I would treat it as optional growth, not foundational growth.

Owner-earnings sanity check Amount Type Comment
Net income ¥10.9bn Official company earnings release, unaudited FY2026 full year TTM base.
Less: sustaining capex About ¥4-5bn My estimate Proxy based on recent audited capex/depreciation history and the group’s ongoing software/platform maintenance needs.
Working capital adjustment Not used Judgment Traditional working-capital analysis is not useful here because brokerage and crypto customer balances heavily distort cash-flow lines.
Rough owner earnings About ¥6-7bn My estimate A conservative cash-yield view.
Owner-earnings yield About 3.7-4.3% My estimate Meaningfully below the headline earnings yield.

Is this meaningfully different from P/E? Yes. The stock’s earnings yield on reported TTM net income is about 6.8%, but the rough owner-earnings yield is closer to 4%. The gap exists because capitalized software and platform spending are real cash outlays, and because financial-company cash-flow statements are noisy. That is why I do not call Monex cheap simply because the P/E looks mid-teens.

Capital efficiency. ROIC is not a very clean lens for a regulated financial holding company with customer-balance-sheet leverage and equity-method affiliates. ROE is the better guide. Reported ROE has ranged from loss-making to the high 20s over the last several years, which tells you this is a market-sensitive and acquisition-noisy group. The more useful read is that management’s FY2026 materials imply only high-single-digit ROE, still well below the company’s stated 15% target. Incremental capital looks strong in AM/WM, acceptable in brokerage, and inconsistent in crypto and M&A. At the group level, this is not yet a high-return compounder.

Business quality. Where do profits actually come from? Today, not mainly from crypto. They come from securities and increasingly from asset management. Why has this been a decent business? Because regulated custody of customer assets, tax/account friction, established brand trust, and partner distribution create stickiness. Why has it not been a great business? Because pricing power is limited, trading volumes are cyclical, and the crypto arm adds noise and capital-allocation complexity.

2. How the Company Makes Money

Monex is easiest to understand as a portfolio of financial platforms rather than as one monolithic broker. The earnings mix matters more than the legal structure.

Business How it makes money Latest economic read
Securities Trading commissions, payment for order flow and related execution economics in the U.S., net interest on customer cash and margin balances, securities lending, and investment-trust distribution in Japan. In FY2026 company materials, securities generated about ¥11.7bn of segment pre-tax profit. This is the core earnings base.
Crypto Asset Coincheck marketplace spreads and fees, staking income, IEO-related fees, custody, and crypto asset-management products through 3iQ and related entities. FY2026 crypto revenue was still substantial, but the segment recorded about ¥0.7bn of pre-tax loss. The franchise is real; the earnings stream is not yet stable.
Asset Management / Wealth Management Management fees, performance fees, private-fund fees, and wealth-management fees. FY2026 segment pre-tax profit was about ¥6.1bn. This is the highest-quality growth engine inside the group, though FY2026 included some fair-value help.
Investment Venture investing, exits, and mark-to-market gains or losses. Small and lumpy. It should be viewed as ancillary, not core.

The key analytical nuance is that Monex Securities in Japan is no longer fully consolidated. Monex still has major economics there, but they now come through equity-method profit. That means the headline revenue line can make the core business look smaller and more crypto-heavy than it really is. Economically, the group is still more broker plus asset gatherer than crypto proxy.

The moat is moderate, not deep. The barriers are regulation, customer trust, security/custody capability, and distribution partnerships such as NTT Docomo in securities and now KDDI in crypto. Clients also do not casually move funded brokerage accounts, NISA accounts, or crypto holdings. But these are not monopoly economics. Brokerage pricing remains contestable, crypto pricing is cyclical, and technology alone is not enough to defend margins. The quality is best in recurring-balance businesses: client cash, assets under custody, and fee-bearing AUM.

3. Why the Stock Fell

In plain terms, Monex went from being treated as a digitally enabled brokerage with crypto upside to being treated as a noisy financial holding company with mediocre group-level ROE. The shares are down roughly 30% from the 52-week high near ¥905 and now sit only slightly above the 52-week low range around ¥625-640.

The immediate reason is that the most recent visible quarter was messy. In FY2026 Q4, group operating-profit-equivalent dropped sharply quarter on quarter, crypto revenue after financing costs fell 27% sequentially, and several small but confidence-damaging costs hit at once: a margin shortfall on a futures/options customer at TradeStation, compensation tied to unauthorized transactions at Monex Securities, U.S.-stock system migration costs in Japan, and management-change and transaction-related costs at Coincheck. None of those items is fatal. Together, they reminded investors that Monex is operationally complex.

The deeper reason is quality skepticism. FY2026 full-year profit recovered, but investors can see that the comparison is flattered by the absence of FY2025 Coincheck listing charges. They also see that crypto remains volatile, U.S. rates are no longer a clean tailwind for interest income, and the group still has not demonstrated stable mid-teens ROE. The KDDI-Coincheck deal was strategically positive, but the market is waiting for revenue proof rather than rewarding the press release.

4. What the Market Is Assuming

(a) One-time, cyclical, or sentiment-driven factors

(b) Medium-term business headwinds

(c) Potential long-term structural threats

Reality check versus the narrative

Market concern Quantitative reality check What it means
The FY2026 rebound is fake FY2025 reported pre-tax profit was -¥3.9bn. Company materials show FY2025 underlying pre-tax earning power at roughly ¥13.6bn after adjusting for Coincheck De-SPAC charges and certain other items. FY2026 reported pre-tax profit was ¥15.8bn. FY2025 included about ¥13.7bn of listing-related stock comp and ¥4.5bn of professional fees at Coincheck. The rebound is partly a base effect, but not purely optical. I do not treat stock comp as fake; I do treat FY2025 as a poor run-rate base.
The core brokerage franchise is stagnating Monex Securities accounts grew from about 1.86m in 2020 to about 2.93m in March 2026, while assets under custody rose from about ¥3.7tn to ¥10.8tn. TradeStation’s high-value target-client count rose from roughly 16.6k to roughly 17.8k from FY2024-end to FY2026-end. The customer-asset base is still expanding. This does not look like a broken brokerage franchise.
AM/WM is too small to matter Company materials show Monex Asset Management product AUM compounding at about 110% from March 2022 to March 2026. FY2026 AM/WM segment revenue reached about ¥7.7bn versus roughly ¥3.5bn the prior year. This segment is now large enough to matter and is probably the best incremental-return business in the group.
Crypto is broken Crypto segment revenue moved from about ¥9.4bn in FY2024 to ¥13.5bn in FY2025 to ¥15.8bn in FY2026. Verified Coincheck accounts rose from about 2.35m in June 2025 to about 2.55m in May 2026. But segment pre-tax profit swung from about +¥2.8bn to -¥13.5bn to -¥0.7bn. The franchise is alive; the monetization model is still cyclical and unstable.
The balance sheet cannot absorb mistakes Group net assets grew from about ¥76.2bn in FY2020 to ¥124.0bn in FY2025 audited, and the FY2026 earnings release showed about ¥130.0bn of net assets. Holding-company net debt was only about ¥9.8bn at March 2026. This is not a solvency story. The issue is earnings quality and returns, not balance-sheet stress.

5. Temporary or Structural?

Most of the recent pain is TIME, not ESSENCE. The latest quarter’s fraud compensation, system migration costs, client margin shortfall, and crypto-volume wobble are all repairable. The real structural question is different: can Monex turn a collection of decent businesses into a consistently high-return group, or will it remain a moderate-quality conglomerate with subpar group ROE?

Structural concern Damaged mechanism Does it damage core value creation? Reversible within 3 years? Classification
Crypto monetization remains tied to volatile trading activity and asset prices Revenue per user in Coincheck’s transaction-driven model It damages the crypto segment’s earning-power stability, but not the core brokerage engine of the whole group. Partly. More staking, custody, and B2B revenue can reduce volatility, but crypto cyclicality itself cannot be engineered away. (b) Real structural but survivable
Conglomerate complexity and uneven capital allocation Incremental return on retained capital and the market’s willingness to value the group on normalized earnings Yes, at the group level. This is the main reason Monex does not deserve a compounder multiple. Yes, but only if management proves restraint and if AM/WM becomes a larger share of profit. That needs evidence, not hope. (b) Real structural but survivable
Cybersecurity and fraud incidents Customer trust and the customer-acquisition funnel Potentially, but current evidence does not show irreversible damage. The recent issue looks costly and embarrassing, not franchise-destroying. Yes. Better authentication, process fixes, and compensation can heal this unless incidents recur. (c) Not truly structural
Brokerage commoditization and lower-rate pressure Monetization per customer account, especially net interest income It pressures margins, but current data still show customer-asset growth and decent trading activity. Yes. The active-trader niche, product breadth, and partner distribution are still there. (c) Not truly structural

The bottom line is that I do not see evidence that the core franchise is impaired in an irreversible way. I do see evidence that the group’s overall returns may stay merely adequate unless management shifts the mix further toward asset gathering and away from volatile, lower-quality earnings sources.

Time-as-a-moat test

That is why I would call Monex’s moat moderate. It is real, but it is built more on regulation, trust, and distribution than on proprietary technology or dominant pricing power.

6. Is the Market Wrong? By How Much?

Moat & Mispricing Score: 6/10. The market is right about two things: Monex is not a pristine compounder, and crypto earnings deserve a heavy discount. What the market is slightly underpricing is the resilience of the core brokerage business and the fact that AM/WM is becoming a meaningful, higher-quality earnings contributor. So I see a modest mispricing, not a dramatic one. This is a stock for someone willing to own a moderately moated, somewhat messy financial platform, not for someone demanding a clean high-ROIC franchise.

This is a FY2026 earnings-release-based valuation, cross-checked against FY2025 audited capex and balance-sheet context. I use normalized earnings rather than rough owner earnings as the main bridge because Monex is a financial platform with noisy operating cash flow and meaningful capitalized software. The owner-earnings check still matters: it tells me the stock is not obviously cheap on cash conversion.

Case Normalized earnings base Required equity yield Implied equity value Implied value per share Vs. current price (~¥634)
Bear ¥8.5bn 7.5% About ¥113bn About ¥450 About 29% downside
Base ¥11.0bn 6.5% About ¥169bn About ¥670 About 6% upside
Bull ¥13.0bn 6.0% About ¥217bn About ¥860 About 36% upside

Valuation bridge. Current market cap of about ¥159.5bn implies a reported TTM earnings yield of roughly 6.8%. My rough owner-earnings estimate implies only about 4%. My base case requires about a 6.5% normalized earnings yield for this mix of moderate balance-sheet risk, useful distribution assets, and real crypto volatility. That is why my base case lands only a little above the current market cap.

A useful cross-check is look-through value. Using June 2026 market data for Coincheck’s U.S.-listed shares and the official post-KDDI share count, Monex’s 71% stake in Coincheck is worth roughly ¥35-40bn on the public market. That means the rest of Monex is being valued at roughly ¥120bn or so. Against current earnings that are coming mostly from securities and AM/WM, that is not demanding. It is also not a huge hidden-asset situation; it is a mild underpricing of the quieter, higher-quality parts of the group.

My conclusion: the market is slightly too pessimistic on the core franchise, but not too pessimistic on crypto volatility or group complexity. That is why the upside looks real but limited unless Monex can prove that FY2026 was not just a better year, but the start of a structurally better earnings mix.

7. Key Facts, Estimates, and Judgments

Item Value / statement Classification
FY2025 revenue ¥73.8bn Audited annual data
FY2025 net income -¥5.1bn Audited annual data
FY2026 revenue ¥83.6bn Official company earnings release, unaudited full-year data
FY2026 net income ¥10.9bn Official company earnings release, unaudited full-year data
Holding-company net debt About ¥9.8bn at March 2026 Official company update, unaudited earnings materials
Current share price / market cap About ¥634 / ¥159.5bn Market-data estimate
FY2027 dividend guidance ¥30.8 per share, or about 4.9% yield at today’s price Company guidance / management update
Normalized EPS About ¥40-45 My estimate
Sustaining capex About ¥4-5bn My estimate
Intrinsic value range About ¥113bn to ¥217bn, base about ¥169bn My estimate
Main judgment The recent damage is mostly time, not essence; the real structural issue is mediocre group-level return on capital, not a broken customer franchise. My judgment

The most important thing not to miss is this: Monex is not a clean crypto proxy, and it is not a high-quality compounder. It is a moderately moated financial platform whose core brokerage and AM businesses are healthier than the stock action suggests, but whose group-level economics are still dragged down by complexity and volatile crypto monetization. That makes it mildly undervalued, not obviously mispriced.


CoffeeAnd — 52-week low lens